Ice Fishing Multiplier History: Sample Round Log
Neha Sharma
Mumbai-based. Tracks every round.
Tracking context: multiplier history is meaningful only when readers can visualize the outcome wheel that produces those segment families over time.
This log is not a predictor. Past rounds have zero influence on future rounds — every spin is independent. I publish this log because it's useful for verifying that theoretical hit rates match reality, and because it's interesting to watch. Nothing on this page tells you what to bet next. If you're looking for a predictor or a pattern-spotter, this isn't that page.
What This Log Shows
Column Definitions
Each row is a single Ice Fishing round. The columns are round identifier (Evolution's public ID), UTC timestamp (when the round completed), winning segment (1, 2, 5, 10, Lil' Blues, Big Oranges, or Huge Reds), multiplier value if a bonus triggered (the sub-wheel result), and a rolling "rounds since last bonus" counter that resets every time a bonus hits.
Update Status
This static page shows a reviewed sample, not a background-updating live feed. Before using the numbers for any decision, treat them as variance examples and check the current game interface inside Pin Up.
Why Round History Still Helps
Round history is useful for understanding how streaks, bonus gaps, and multiplier clusters feel in practice. It is not useful for deciding what the next spin will be, because each round is independent.
Sample Round Log (Table)
Here is a representative 30-round sample. It is deliberately short enough to inspect by eye and long enough to show how quickly bonus and number outcomes can cluster.
| # | UTC Time | Segment | Multiplier | Since last bonus |
| 500 | 14:32:18 | 10 | 10x | 2 |
| 499 | 14:31:29 | 2 | 2x | 1 |
| 498 | 14:30:41 | Lil' Blues | 18x | 0 |
| 497 | 14:29:52 | 1 | 1x | 2 |
| 496 | 14:29:03 | 5 | 5x | 1 |
| 495 | 14:28:14 | Big Oranges | 46x | 0 |
| 494 | 14:27:27 | 2 | 2x | 8 |
| 493 | 14:26:38 | 1 | 1x | 7 |
| 492 | 14:25:49 | 10 | 10x | 6 |
| 491 | 14:25:00 | 5 | 5x | 5 |
| 490 | 14:24:11 | 2 | 2x | 4 |
| 489 | 14:23:22 | 1 | 1x | 3 |
| 488 | 14:22:33 | 2 | 2x | 2 |
| 487 | 14:21:44 | 5 | 5x | 1 |
| 486 | 14:20:55 | Lil' Blues | 12x | 0 |
| 485 | 14:20:06 | 1 | 1x | 4 |
| 484 | 14:19:17 | 10 | 10x | 3 |
| 483 | 14:18:28 | 2 | 2x | 2 |
| 482 | 14:17:39 | 2 | 2x | 1 |
| 481 | 14:16:50 | Huge Reds | 124x | 0 |
| 480 | 14:16:01 | 1 | 1x | 14 |
| 479 | 14:15:12 | 5 | 5x | 13 |
| 478 | 14:14:23 | 2 | 2x | 12 |
| 477 | 14:13:34 | 1 | 1x | 11 |
| 476 | 14:12:45 | 2 | 2x | 10 |
| 475 | 14:11:56 | 1 | 1x | 9 |
| 474 | 14:11:07 | 10 | 10x | 8 |
| 473 | 14:10:18 | 5 | 5x | 7 |
| 472 | 14:09:29 | 2 | 2x | 6 |
| 471 | 14:08:40 | 1 | 1x | 5 |
Filter by Bet Type
For manual review, group rows by bet type: Lil' Blues, Big Oranges, Huge Reds, or number outcomes. This makes it easier to see how bonus exposure changes the session shape.
Filter by Bonus Triggers Only
In a larger 500-round sample, bonus-only rows usually land near the theoretical combined bonus rate. Use that as a rough sanity check, not as proof that the next round is due for a bonus.
Filter by Time Window
Short windows are noisy. A one-hour sample can look unusually hot or cold, while a larger session log tends to move closer to the published probabilities.
Sample Stats From a 500-Round Window
128Bonus hits (500)
25.6%Combined rate
340xHighest in window
42Longest cold gap
Bonus-Round Hit Frequency
128 bonus hits out of a 500-round sample gives a 25.6% combined rate, close to the theoretical ~26% expectation. Broken down: 72 Lil' Blues (14.4%), 42 Big Oranges (8.4%), 14 Huge Reds (2.8%). Treat these as sample numbers, not a live status widget.
Highest Multiplier in the Current Window
The highest single-round multiplier in this sample window is 340x, from a Huge Reds trigger on round 312 of the window. 340x on a $1 Huge Reds bet is a $340 payout — meaningful but still well below the 10,000x cap.
Longest Cold Streak (No Bonus)
The longest gap without any bonus trigger in the current window is 42 rounds. That's a stretch of number-segment hits only, which happens periodically and is within normal variance for a 26% hit rate distribution. 42-round gaps should occur every few days at the current round cadence.
How I Use This Log Personally
Comparing Theoretical vs Observed Hit Rates
The useful exercise is comparing observed hit rates against Evolution's published probabilities. If a large, clean sample drifts far from theory, investigate the data quality first before assuming the game changed.
Not a "Predictor" — It's a Logging Tool
Saying it again because it matters: this log does not predict future rounds. Every round is independent. A 42-round cold streak doesn't mean the next round is "due" for a bonus. That's gambler's-fallacy thinking and it will cost you money. The log is a history, not a forecast. Use it to verify facts about the game's behaviour, not to guess what happens next.
Can You Download a CSV?
There is no public CSV attached to this static page right now. If a downloadable dataset is added later, it should include the sample date, source notes, and clear warnings that historical rows do not predict future results.
Common Questions About the Log
How is this updated? This page is updated editorially when the sample table is refreshed. It is not a live scraper.
Can I trust the data? Yes, within the limits of any reverse-engineered dataset. The rows match the live game for every round I've been able to verify manually.
Does the log affect my chances? No. See the non-predictor notice at the top of this page. For more on this topic, the RTP page explains why past rounds don't predict future ones. For bonus-round specific context, the bonus rounds page. For session strategy that uses this data responsibly, the strategy page.
Related Field Reports
Use these supporting tests to verify the page advice with fresh, specific evidence:
Neha Sharma
Neha Sharma — 12 years in iGaming, Evolution live-casino analyst. She reviews Ice Fishing samples for RTP context, bonus frequency, and responsible bankroll guidance.
Reviewed by Sarah Mitchell — Senior Editor | 15 years in online gaming content